Banning Bite Mark Evidence as Admissible Evidence (until its efficacy is proven)

Bite mark evidence is not backed by scientific research, but has been used to put many people in prison, potentially wrongly. Here is an article that discusses this issue https://californiainnocenceproject.org/issues-we-face/bite-mark-evidence/. John Oliver of Last Week Tonight also featured the pitfalls of bite mark evidence being used at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScmJvmzDcG0.

I want to propose a law that states:

Bite mark evidence may not be used in any trial for any reason until the following conditions are met:

Condition A: 3 peer reviewed scientific studies confirm the validity of bite mark evidence as reliable evidence in court for a criminal conviction

Condition B: The use of bite mark evidence is approved by the federal Department of Justice of the United States of America after Condition A has been met